Recently I took over as South Australian coordinator of National Archaeology Week from Emily Jateff of the SA Maritime Museum and I’m looking for some people, organisations, departments or companies who are interested in organising an event or two (or those who have ideas for events) for NAW 2014. NAW begins on the third Sunday of May each year, so the dates for 2014 are 18th-24th of May.
NAW has been very successful over the last few years in South Australia under Emily’s watch and I’d like that to continue for the next few years. Events that have been held in the past include fieldwork demonstrations, museum displays, seminars, tours and competitions, all with the purpose of engaging the public with archaeology and archaeologists.
If you’d like to organise an event or propose an idea, I’m holding a meeting at the Earl of Aberdeen Hotel (Coopers Alehouse) in the city next Thursday the 23rd of January from 6pm. So, if you can make it to the meeting next week come along and I can help you sort out the details, and if not, then please don’t hesitate to email me and I can help you from there.
As you might already know, About Time: SA’s History Festival runs from the 1-31 May, so NAW will run during that festival. If you are able to organise your event by the 7th of February, we will be able to have your event published in the About Time programme (and potentially increase your audience!). So get organising!
For those who are unfamiliar with NAW:
National Archaeology Week aims to increase public awareness of Australian archaeology and the work of Australian archaeologists both at home and abroad, and to promote the importance of protecting Australia’s unique archaeological heritage. Held in the third week of May, this exciting nationwide program of events and activities will include public lectures, seminars, exhibits, demonstration excavations and displays. Check out your state for events in your local area.
A new website for National Archaeology Week will be coming soon. In the meantime, check out the facebook page which has all the information about the week’s events.
Mitchell Johnson lines up to bowl at the Cathedral end of the new-look Adelaide Oval. A slow clap resounds from the western grandstand of the partially redeveloped complex, in support of the Australian fast bowler. English captain Alastair Cook responds to Johnson’s head-high bouncer with a hook shot, but is caught by Ryan Harris at fine leg.
The crowd’s applause quickly turns to a roar as Harris tumbles, recovering from his catch. Eyes move to the historic scoreboard where the numbers are rotated manually to show that England is now one-for-one, chasing 531 in its second innings of the second Ashes test.
In a time where built heritage is too often neglected in preference of development, the century-old scoreboard stood earlier this week as a reminder of the Oval’s tremendous antiquity and the cultural significance of this place.
The century-old Adelaide Oval scoreboard remains standing amongst the 21st century development and technology. Adriano of Adelaide
As part of a A$535 million collaboration between the Government of South Australia and the Adelaide Oval Stadium Management Authority (AOSMA), the Adelaide Oval has been undergoing a major facelift since 2010 to bring its facilities into the 21st century. The Oval will once again be the home of sport in South Australia: international and local cricket matches will be fought on the same turf as AFL, which is leaving AAMI Stadium behind in 2014 in favour of the modernised ground.
The redevelopment has had its share of opponents – most notably from the peak body of heritage protection in South Australia, the National Trust (SA), who threatened to delist the heritage-listed features of Adelaide Oval from the South Australian Heritage Register since many features had been demolished. They claimed:
the ground is no longer an iconic cricket ground, it’s turning into a generic universal stadium that could be anywhere in the world.
The new western grandstand. You can see part of the original George Giffen stand in yellow directly between the upper and lower levels. mertie
What has been removed and what remains?
All pre-2010 stands at the Adelaide Oval have been demolished, including most of the George Giffen, Sir Edwin Smith and Mostyn Evan stands, which are listed on the SA Heritage Register. Parts of those stands remain, including the red brick archways and the centre of the George Giffen stand, which make up a portion of the new western grandstand.
The heritage-listed manual scoreboard, designed by renowned South Australian architect Kenneth Milne and erected in 1911, remains standing at the northern end of the complex, flanked by the famous grassed northern mound and Moreton Bay figs.
Pacifying those with a desire to have the most up-to-date technology, the old scoreboard is complemented by a new video screen that has been erected directly beside it. The heritage features of the Oval sit effectively within the newer structures to create a scene that is both contemporary, yet uniquely Adelaide.
Major features removed:
All pre-2010 grandstands (some were listed on the SA Heritage Register).
Major features remaining:
Victor Richardson Gates (local heritage listing, to be re-installed after construction work has ceased).
Scoreboard (constructed 1911, confirmed as a State Heritage Place in the SA Heritage Register, 1986).
Parts of the George Giffen (constructed 1882, redeveloped 1889, 1929), Sir Edwin Smith (constructed 1929) and Mostyn Evan (constructed 1929) grandstands (collectively confirmed as a State Heritage Place in the SA Heritage Register, 1986).
Northern mound and Moreton Bay Fig trees.
From this … Simon Lieschke
Development vs heritage
Has Adelaide Oval lost its cultural significance, as feared by the National Trust (SA) and Oliver Brown at The Telegraph? Or should the oval go one step further, as proposed by Bernard Humphreys at The Advertiser, and remove the old scoreboard?
In my view, the scoreboard must stay at the Adelaide Oval. Removing it from this place will mean that it loses all of its cultural significance, even if it is moved to another venue, such as the Thebarton Oval.
Structures of this sort do not become culturally significant and “mean” something by themselves. People give them meaning; stakeholders give them meaning. Our collective experiences at Adelaide Oval, such as the one illustrated in the first paragraph of this article, make such structures significant.
Removing the scoreboard will mean the intangible heritage of Adelaide Oval will be lost and so too will the meaning we give to it. Only when features such as the scoreboard, the Moreton Bay figs and the remainder of the historic grandstands are removed will Adelaide Oval become a “generic universal stadium”. That does not look like happening any time soon.
Development and heritage
“Development” has become synonymous with “destruction” in conversations about heritage in recent years. But there is an opportunity to harmonise heritage and development, and AOSMA has demonstrated this successfully.
As well as retaining the heritage features of the Oval, AOSMA has managed to create a state-of-the-art sporting and entertainment venue that will allow South Australia to attract major international events and, in effect, boost the state’s economy.
Save for cricket season, over the summer, and the odd concert, Adelaide Oval was underused and neglected. This was to be its future and its legacy had this redevelopment not taken place.
Now, with stands that will be able to accommodate up to 50,000 people once the project is completed, greater parking and public transport facilities, and the AFL moving back, AOSMA and the South Australian government have breathed A$535 million of life into Adelaide Oval and the state of South Australia.
The example that AOSMA has set can be put to use at other historic heritage places – so long as the needs of the key stakeholders are met, heritage experts are consulted and the cultural significance of the place is not compromised.
Jordan Ralph does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.